I am also to inclose a Copy of the Ordinance No. 9 of 1862, and I am to request that you will move their Lordships to inform His Grace whether there is any reason why the Ordinance No. 2 of 1867 should not remain for His Majesty's confirmation and allowance.
...
The Memorial to the Annie, a Chong 7549/62. Altered. My later No. 244, 154, 8 here 1868. Sir, with reference to my letter of the 29th Augt last, which has not yet been answered.
...
I am to request that you will move the Lords to forward to him their opinion upon the Ordinance entitled "No 2 of 1867" for the "Regulation of Police Force". This Ordinance was inclosed in my letter aforementioned.
Jan der J.F.Ee.
With the Duke of Buckingham. Cofg. No.160-19 Left /os Adw 9855 Ance? 9316 Any 25/18-
Page 10
...
Page 10
It appears the original text was not properly ordered and had several OCR errors. The above response corrects obvious spelling mistakes, reorders the text for better coherence, and formats it according to the given instructions.
However, to follow the instructions to output only HTML using `` for paragraphs and not including any explanation or comments, the corrected version should be:
I am also to inclose a Copy of the Ordinance No. 9 of 1862, and I am to request that you will move their Lordships to inform His Grace whether there is any reason why the Ordinance No. 2 of 1867 should not remain for His Majesty's confirmation and allowance.
The Memorial to the Annie, a Chong 7549/62. Altered. My later No. 244, 154, 8 here 1868. Sir, with reference to my letter of the 29th Augt last, which has not yet been answered.
I am to request that you will move the Lords to forward to him their opinion upon the Ordinance entitled "No 2 of 1867" for the "Regulation of Police Force". This Ordinance was inclosed in my letter aforementioned.
Jan der J.F.Ee.
With the Duke of Buckingham. Cofg. No.160-19 Left /os Adw 9855 Ance? 9316 Any 25/18-
Page 10
...
Page 10
I am also to inclose as
Copy of the bidinance ho.
9
of 1862
1862, and Iam to regrest
that you will more their
You
Lordships to inform his Grace
whether thew is any reason
10 why the Ordinance No. 2
of 1867 should not remen
= Seo Majiety's confirmation
and allowance
•
Jan der J.F.Ee.
The hemlar, to the
Annie
a chong 7549/62
Autered
My later
n q
No 244
154
8 here 1868
Sie, with upere
Jame directed
می
With the Wenke of Buckingham.
4
Cofg for. No.160-19 Left /os
Adw
9855
Ance? 9316 Any 25/18-
thandos to request
в
that
Zou
will
move
the Lords found. the
Admically to farom: him with their opinion
upon the Ordmaine uttonky
его
a
Naval
No 2 0/1867" for the Sriallitur
Regulation of Band Polin Force Ind
This ormanawa.
suelond
in my letter of the 29 Augt last, which has not father ausard.
W
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.